Step by Step procedure to run a program on FPGA board. Software and hardware used. 12 Responses to Step by Step procedure to run a program on FPGA board. Software- defined radio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Software- defined radio (SDR) is a radiocommunication system where components that have been typically implemented in hardware (e. Significant amounts of signal processing are handed over to the general- purpose processor, rather than being done in special- purpose hardware (electronic circuits). Such a design produces a radio which can receive and transmit widely different radio protocols (sometimes referred to as waveforms) based solely on the software used. Software radios have significant utility for the military and cell phone services, both of which must serve a wide variety of changing radio protocols in real time. In the long term, software- defined radios are expected by proponents like the SDRForum (now The Wireless Innovation Forum) to become the dominant technology in radio communications. SDRs, along with software defined antennas are the enablers of the cognitive radio. View programmer-Xilinx FPGA software is used for configuring the program. Once the program is implemented it. University Program; Documentation Navigator Download Today. Community Forums Join Now. Download only what you need! FPGA software Design software. FPGA vendors provide design software. The free software is usually fine to start with because it is. A software- defined radio can be flexible enough to avoid the . A digital signal processor would read the converter, and then its software would transform the stream of data from the converter to any other form the application requires. An ideal transmitter would be similar. A digital signal processor would generate a stream of numbers. These would be sent to a digital- to- analog converter connected to a radio antenna. The ideal scheme is not completely realizable due to the actual limits of the technology. The main problem in both directions is the difficulty of conversion between the digital and the analog domains at a high enough rate and a high enough accuracy at the same time, and without relying upon physical processes like interference and electromagnetic resonance for assistance. Receiver architecture. However, in some applications it is not necessary to tune the signal to an intermediate frequency and the radio frequency signal is directly sampled by the analog- to- digital converter (after amplification). Real analog- to- digital converters lack the dynamic range to pick up sub- microvolt, nanowatt- power radio signals. Therefore, a low- noise amplifier must precede the conversion step and this device introduces its own problems. For example, if spurious signals are present (which is typical), these compete with the desired signals within the amplifier's dynamic range. They may introduce distortion in the desired signals, or may block them completely. The standard solution is to put band- pass filters between the antenna and the amplifier, but these reduce the radio's flexibility. Real software radios often have two or three analog channel filters with different bandwidths that are switched in and out. History. A laboratory called the Gold Room at TRW in California created a software baseband analysis tool called Midas, which had its operation defined in software. The term . A 'Software Radio Proof- of- Concept' laboratory was developed there that popularized Software Radio within various government agencies. Software Defined Radio using MATLAB.This 1. 98. 4 Software Radio was a digital baseband receiver that provided programmable interference cancellation and demodulation for broadband signals, typically with thousands of adaptive filter taps, using multiple array processors accessing shared memory. E- Systems Melpar sold the software radio idea to the US Air Force. Melpar built a prototype commanders' tactical terminal in 1. Texas Instruments TMS3. C3. 0 processors and Harris digital receiver chip sets with digitally synthesized transmission. That prototype didn't last long because when E- Systems ECI Division manufactured the first limited production units, they decided to . The Air Force would not let Mitola publish the technical details of that prototype, nor would they let Diane Wasserman publish related software life cycle lessons learned because they regarded it as a . SPEAKeasy, the military software radio was formulated by Wayne Bonser, then of Rome Air Development Center (RADC), now Rome Labs; by Alan Margulies of MITRE Rome, NY; and then Lt Beth Kaspar, the original DARPA SPEAKeasy project manager and by others at Rome including Don Upmal. Although Mitola's IEEE publications resulted in the largest global footprint for software radio, Mitola privately credits that Do. D lab of the 1. 97. Carl, Dave, and John with inventing the digital receiver technology on which he based software radio once it was possible to transmit via software. A few months after the National Telesystems Conference 1. E- Systems corporate program review, a vice- president of E- Systems Garland Division objected to Melpar's (Mitola's) use of the term . Alan Jackson, Melpar VP of marketing at that time asked the Garland VP if their laboratory or devices included transmitters. Many amateur radio operators and HF radio engineers had realized the value of digitizing HF at RF and of processing it with Texas Instruments TI C3. DSPs) and their precursors during the 1. Radio engineers at Roke Manor in the UK and at an organization in Germany had recognized the benefits of ADC at the RF in parallel, so success has many fathers. Mitola's publication of software radio in the IEEE opened the concept to the broad community of radio engineers. His landmark May 1. IEEE Communications Magazine with the cover . Mitola was introduced by Joao da Silva in 1. First International Conference on Software Radio as . Mitola objected to Blust's term, but finally accepted it as a pragmatic pathway towards the ideal software radio. Though the concept was first implemented with an IF ADC in the early 1. U. S. One of the first public software radio initiatives was the U. S. DARPA- Air Force military project named Speak. Easy. The primary goal of the Speak. Easy project was to use programmable processing to emulate more than 1. MHz. Air Force tactical ground air control party that could operate from 2 MHz to 2 GHz, and thus could interoperate with ground force radios (frequency- agile VHF, FM, and SINCGARS), Air Force radios (VHF AM), Naval Radios (VHF AM and HFSSBteleprinters) and satellites (microwave. QAM). Some particular goals were to provide a new signal format in two weeks from a standing start, and demonstrate a radio into which multiple contractors could plug parts and software. The project was demonstrated at TF- XXI Advanced Warfighting Exercise, and demonstrated all of these goals in a non- production radio. There was some discontent with failure of these early software radios to adequately filter out of band emissions, to employ more than the simplest of interoperable modes of the existing radios, and to lose connectivity or crash unexpectedly. Its cryptographic processor could not change context fast enough to keep several radio conversations on the air at once. Its software architecture, though practical enough, bore no resemblance to any other. The SPEAKeasy architecture was refined at the MMITS Forum between 1. Do. D integrated process team (IPT) for programmable modular communications systems (PMCS) to proceed with what became the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS). The basic arrangement of the radio receiver used an antenna feeding an amplifier and down- converter (see Frequency mixer) feeding an automatic gain control, which fed an analog to digital converter that was on a computer VMEbus with a lot of digital signal processors (Texas Instruments C4. The transmitter had digital to analog converters on the PCI bus feeding an up converter (mixer) that led to a power amplifier and antenna. The very wide frequency range was divided into a few sub- bands with different analog radio technologies feeding the same analog to digital converters. This has since become a standard design scheme for wide band software radios. SPEAKeasy phase II. The secondary goals were to make it smaller, cheaper, and weigh less. The project produced a demonstration radio only fifteen months into a three- year research project. The demonstration was so successful that further development was halted, and the radio went into production with only a 4 MHz to 4. MHz range. The software architecture identified standard interfaces for different modules of the radio: . Instead, they send messages over the PCIcomputer bus to each other with a layered protocol. As a military project, the radio strongly distinguished . The time to reprogram these was an issue limiting application of the radio. Today, the time to write a program for an FPGA is still significant, but the time to download a stored FPGA program is around 2. This means an SDR could change transmission protocols and frequencies in one fiftieth of a second, probably not an intolerable interruption for that task. Current usage. Examples of radio terminals that require support include hand- held, vehicular, airborne and dismounted radios, as well as base- stations (fixed and maritime). This goal is achieved through the use of SDR systems based on an internationally endorsed open Software Communications Architecture (SCA). This standard uses CORBA on POSIX operating systems to coordinate various software modules. The program is providing a flexible new approach to meet diverse soldier communications needs through software programmable radio technology. All functionality and expandability is built upon the SCA. The SCA, despite its military origin, is under evaluation by commercial radio vendors for applicability in their domains. The adoption of general- purpose SDR frameworks outside of military, intelligence, experimental and amateur uses, however, is inherently hampered by the fact that civilian users can more easily settle with a fixed architecture, optimized for a specific function, and as such more economical in mass market applications. Still, software defined radio's inherent flexibility can yield substantial benefits in the longer run, once the fixed costs of implementing it have gone down enough to overtake the cost of iterated redesign of purpose built systems. This then explains the increasing commercial interest in the technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |